Writing Resources > Students (Page 1 of 29)

How Human Editors Catch What Automated Tools Miss

AI tools can make scientific manuscripts read fluently while introducing new errors that are difficult to detect: hallucinated references, generic text, and reasoning gaps that grammar checkers can't catch. Scribendi's scientific editors explain what human editorial review actually involves, such as finding where arguments don't hold, catching inconsistencies across sections, and protecting the author's voice.

Reading Before the Reviewer: What Editors Look for in Scientific Manuscripts

Scientific manuscripts contain patterns of errors that authors rarely catch on their own. This post breaks down what editors consistently encounter (from citation errors to coordination gaps) and what they're looking for when they read a manuscript before it reaches review.

AI Manuscript Generation and the Limits of Authorship

What does it mean to put your name on a paper you didn't write? A critical look at PaperOrchestra and the limits of AI authorship in research.

The End of Anonymization at Scribendi

In this blog post, we'll discuss Scribendi's original anonymization policy, why we felt a change was necessary, and what this means going forward for our clients and our editors.

Which Academic Editing Service Do You Need?

Choose the best Scribendi academic editing service for your document. Learn about our editing, proofreading, and review service options for journal articles, theses, dissertations, abstracts, proposals, and other forms of academic and research writing.

Ensuring High-Quality Feedback: Scribendi's Editor Engagement Project

Human editors can use commentary to provide the critical feedback that AI can't. To ensure that our editors are consistently offering engaged, detailed commentary, Scribendi has launched its editor engagement project. Editorial Manager Bryan Russell shares his thoughts on the project and how human editors can make all the difference for a text.